I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Which one You like the most Let me know in the Comments below.，推荐阅读服务器推荐获取更多信息
。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
Geoff Scott appointed in medical department overhaul
Continue reading...，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
Иран вернул в строй угрожающий кораблям США российский «Палтус»Иран вернул в строй построенную в России подлодку проекта 877ЭКМ «Палтус»